Review Policy
Tattoos.com manually reviews tattoos, artists, and shops before they are published. This policy explains the standards we use to approve, reject, update, and remove content.
Tattoo submissions
We look for clear, relevant tattoos that add value to browsing.
We review whether images are appropriate for the page, whether the tattoo appears genuine, and whether the submission is complete enough to help users understand what they are seeing.
Artist profiles
We review artist listings for credibility and usefulness.
We look for enough identifying information, coherent presentation, and work that helps users understand the artist’s style, focus, and fit.
Shop profiles
We review shop pages for accurate business context and quality.
We look for consistent shop details, believable location information, and listings that appear to represent real studios rather than filler or spam.
Common approval signals
What usually helps content get approved.
- •The submission is clearly connected to tattoos, a tattoo artist, or a tattoo shop.
- •The page includes enough useful detail to help visitors browse or compare options.
- •Images and text appear relevant, coherent, and not obviously misleading.
- •The listing looks original or properly connected to the artist or studio it represents.
- •The overall quality meets the standard we want readers to expect from the platform.
Common rejection or removal reasons
What can keep a listing off the site or cause it to be removed.
- •Spam, mass-produced submissions, or low-effort profiles.
- •Duplicate content or listings that add no new value.
- •Suspicious ownership claims, deceptive details, or inconsistent business information.
- •Images or descriptions that appear unrelated, stolen, or heavily misleading.
- •Content that is incomplete enough to create a poor or confusing user experience.
Questions about a listing
If something looks wrong, we want to know.
Readers, artists, and studios can contact us when a profile is inaccurate, outdated, duplicated, or misattributed.